Why Jesus Chose Misfits Over the Religious
An Interesting Examination
Why Jesus Chose Misfits Over the Religious
An Interesting Examination
The New Testament is replete with instances where Jesus Christ chooses to spend time with social outcasts, sinners, and so-called misfits rather than with the religious elite. This evident in his interactions with tax collectors, fishermen, and even a Samaritan woman. This poses a compelling question: why did Jesus favor these seemingly unworthy individuals over those who, by societal standards, were considered virtuous and devout? The answer lies in the contrast between self-righteousness and genuine humility, the limitations of ritualistic piety, and a broader, more inclusive vision of community and spirituality.
The Dangers of Self-Righteousness
One cannot discuss this topic without delving into the flawed nature of self-righteousness. Often, religious leaders like the Pharisees viewed themselves as the epitome of virtue, mainly because they strictly adhered to the Mosaic Law. The Book of Luke, chapter 18, verses 9-14, presents a telling example through the parable of the Pharisee and the Publican. The Pharisee, standing in the temple, thanks God that he is not like other men—extortioners, unjust, or adulterers. Meanwhile, the Publican stands afar off, not daring to look to heaven, beating his breast and asking God for mercy. Jesus concludes by stating the Publican returned to his home justified, rather than the Pharisee. The takeaway is clear: self-righteousness is not a pathway to God's favor.
The Humble Heart as Fertile Ground
Contrastingly, sinners who were cognizant of their flaws were more amenable to Jesus' teachings. Their humility created fertile ground for spiritual growth and transformation. Matthew, chapter 9, verses 10-13, offers a compelling narrative. When questioned for dining with tax collectors and sinners, Jesus replies that he came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance. The humble heart, aware of its need for improvement, is more receptive to Jesus' message of redemption.
The Folly of External Piety
Another angle to consider is the hollowness of external displays of piety. The religious leaders of the day were exceptionally skilled at outward manifestations of righteousness but often failed at cultivating an inner spiritual life. In Matthew, chapter 23, Jesus offers a scathing critique of such practices. He accuses the Pharisees of focusing on minute details like tithing herbs, while neglecting weightier matters of the law like justice, mercy, and faith. This distinction between external piety and internal spiritual sincerity is central to understanding why Jesus favored the seemingly undeserving over the overtly devout.
Inclusivity and Community
Jesus' choices also point to a more inclusive vision of community and spirituality. In His kingdom, traditional labels and social standings were secondary to one's willingness to accept His teachings and undergo transformation. By associating with the marginalized, Jesus showcased a form of spirituality that transcended social norms. It was a stark departure from the exclusive religious circles of His day and pointed towards a more universal acceptance of those who seek God's presence in their lives.
Conclusion
The choice of Jesus to commune with sinners and social outcasts was not arbitrary but steeped in deep theological and moral significance. It serves as an indictment against the dangers of self-righteousness, the limitations of external piety, and the fallacy of an exclusive spiritual community. In contrast, it highlights the value of humility, internal spiritual sincerity, and a more inclusive vision of what it means to be part of God's kingdom. By choosing the misfits, Jesus did not just redefine the qualifications for spiritual worthiness; He offered a pathway for all to come to Him, irrespective of their past or present circumstances.