Navigating the Paradox of Holiness
Unto Good and Unto Evil
Watch the associated podcast clicking here
Navigating the Paradox of Holiness: Unto Good and Unto Evil
The concept of holiness is deeply embedded in the Christian tradition, often associated with goodness, purity, and divine separation. Yet, as we delve into the Scriptures, we encounter a perplexing paradox: holiness can be consecrated both unto good and unto evil. This paradox challenges our understanding and prompts us to explore the multifaceted dimensions of what it truly means to be set apart.
Jericho: Holiness and Curse
A vivid illustration of this paradox is found in the city of Jericho. In Joshua 6, God commands the Israelites to conquer the city, and He sets it apart for destruction. The Lord declared, "And ye, in any wise keep yourselves from the accursed thing, lest ye make yourselves accursed, when ye take of the accursed thing, and make the camp of Israel a curse, and trouble it" (Joshua 6:18, KJV).
Here, we witness a dual nature of holiness. Jericho, as a city set apart for destruction, becomes holy unto evil – a curse. The devoted items in Jericho were to be set apart for the Lord's use, and yet, this consecration unto God also signified a curse. This paradox serves as a poignant reminder that holiness isn't confined to virtuous outcomes alone.
Beyond Divine Command: A Dichotomy Unveiled
In Romans 14:1 through Chapter 15:7, the Apostle Paul delves into a discourse on matters of personal convictions and holiness. He addresses the delicate balance between freedom in Christ and the potential for causing stumbling blocks among believers. While the context revolves around dietary choices and observance of special holy days, it unveils an essential lesson about holiness.
Paul addresses believers who hold different views regarding the consumption of certain foods and the observance of specific days. Some, he notes, abstain from certain foods, while others partake freely. He emphasizes that the kingdom of God is not about these external practices but about righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit (Romans 14:17, KJV).
Paul acknowledges that believers are setting apart holy days and abstaining from certain foods. However, the crux of his message lies in recognizing that these practices can be divisive if not approached with love and respect for fellow believers.
In this passage, we witness the dichotomy of holiness beyond divine command. The act of setting apart certain foods or observing particular days can either be a demonstration of personal conviction or a source of potential division. Paul emphasizes that both choices are valid as long as they are carried out in honor of the Lord (Romans 14:6, KJV).
This unveils a profound truth: holiness isn't limited to conforming to specific regulations from God but extends to our intentions and attitudes. When we set apart foods, days, or any aspect of our lives as holy unto the Lord, it should be driven by a heart aligned with love, understanding, and respect for our fellow believers.
As believers, we are invited to embrace this dichotomy of holiness beyond mere compliance with commands. Our actions of setting apart hold deeper meaning when they reflect Christ's love and unity. Paul encourages us to prioritize relationships over personal convictions, emphasizing that our pursuit of holiness should be a unifying force in the body of Christ.
Conclusion: Navigating the Paradox
In our exploration of the paradox of holiness, we unearth a truth that challenges the simplicity of black-and-white understanding. Holiness can be dual in nature – consecrated unto good and unto evil, guided by divine command or human intention.
Our faith journey requires us to navigate this paradox with discernment. Let us recognize that the act of being set apart carries immense power, and our choices shape its outcome. As we set apart elements of our lives may our intention always align with God's wisdom, love, and the pursuit of righteousness, ultimately reflecting the complexities and profundities of holiness itself.